|
VPP 16.09 RC0 cutover punch list
Folks,
Under:
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP#VPP_Committer_Tasks
I create the VPP 1609 punchlist:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hyiGLNEZwM1EW496foW7_SoNWtQQs1a2JFGybUZ97U4/edit?usp=sharing
You
Folks,
Under:
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP#VPP_Committer_Tasks
I create the VPP 1609 punchlist:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hyiGLNEZwM1EW496foW7_SoNWtQQs1a2JFGybUZ97U4/edit?usp=sharing
You
|
By
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
·
#1
·
|
|
Documenting the magic of fixing nexus apt repos
I wanted to take a moment to document the magic that happened that I believe fixed the issues with apt repos in nexus.
This was the patch:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2426/
The trick was hinted to
I wanted to take a moment to document the magic that happened that I believe fixed the issues with apt repos in nexus.
This was the patch:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/2426/
The trick was hinted to
|
By
Edward Warnicke
·
#2
·
|
|
Maintenance windows & disaster recovery notifications
Hi,
In the Jenkins job: https://jenkins.fd.io/view/csit/job/csit-vpp-perf-master-long/
There are 2 job runs are missing #7 #8 and the job id suddenly jumped to #1024
Could you please start
Hi,
In the Jenkins job: https://jenkins.fd.io/view/csit/job/csit-vpp-perf-master-long/
There are 2 job runs are missing #7 #8 and the job id suddenly jumped to #1024
Could you please start
|
By
Miroslav Miklus -X (mmiklus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <mmiklus@...>
·
#3
·
|
|
Honeycomb integration job
Hello ci-management,
if possible, please expedite reviewing the following change:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/3018
It updates triggers for running a new Jenkins job, needed by the Honeycomb project to
Hello ci-management,
if possible, please expedite reviewing the following change:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/3018
It updates triggers for running a new Jenkins job, needed by the Honeycomb project to
|
By
Samuel Elias -X (samelias - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <samelias@...>
·
#5
·
|
|
CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Hello,
After planning and preparation phase, the infrastructure and code is now in final phase of making the switch over to new Ubuntu 16.04.1.
CSIT commit for changes in bootstrap/topology
Hello,
After planning and preparation phase, the infrastructure and code is now in final phase of making the switch over to new Ubuntu 16.04.1.
CSIT commit for changes in bootstrap/topology
|
By
Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <pmikus@...>
·
#6
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Peter,
I was going to complete the review of 3290 and merge it, but I'm currently getting an error from https://gerrit.fd.io:
"502 Bad Gateway". I'll try again in a few
Peter,
I was going to complete the review of 3290 and merge it, but I'm currently getting an error from https://gerrit.fd.io:
"502 Bad Gateway". I'll try again in a few
|
By
Dave Wallace <dwallacelf@...>
·
#7
·
|
|
Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
I’ve pinged the Linux Foundation on their “emergency” alias. Gerrit.fd.io is inaccessible.
Thanks… Dave
I’ve pinged the Linux Foundation on their “emergency” alias. Gerrit.fd.io is inaccessible.
Thanks… Dave
|
By
Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbarach@...>
·
#8
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Thanks Peter - Great job !
Ed, CJ, Could you assist us with coordinated switch-over in both vpp and ci-mgmt projects per Peter’s points 2) and 3) as they have to be applied concurrently.
Would like
Thanks Peter - Great job !
Ed, CJ, Could you assist us with coordinated switch-over in both vpp and ci-mgmt projects per Peter’s points 2) and 3) as they have to be applied concurrently.
Would like
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkonstan@...>
·
#9
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Ed, CJ, Possible to coordinate switchover tomorrow? We need to update concurrently both repos: VPP and ci-management. Detail below.
So we need to coordinate with ci-management committers. Pls confirm
Ed, CJ, Possible to coordinate switchover tomorrow? We need to update concurrently both repos: VPP and ci-management. Detail below.
So we need to coordinate with ci-management committers. Pls confirm
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkonstan@...>
·
#10
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Maciek,
I can provided assistance on both fronts starting from 8am PST. It would be good to have sysadmin support as well just in case.
Ed
Maciek,
I can provided assistance on both fronts starting from 8am PST. It would be good to have sysadmin support as well just in case.
Ed
|
By
Edward Warnicke
·
#4
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Excellent. 8am PDT it is. Thx!
-Maciek
Excellent. 8am PDT it is. Thx!
-Maciek
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkonstan@...>
·
#11
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Maciek,
Is there a webex set up for the switchover? I'm not seeing any traffic on IRC...
Thanks,
-daw-
On 10/16/16 4:42 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz
Maciek,
Is there a webex set up for the switchover? I'm not seeing any traffic on IRC...
Thanks,
-daw-
On 10/16/16 4:42 PM, Maciek Konstantynowicz
|
By
Dave Wallace <dwallacelf@...>
·
#12
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] CSIT switchover to Ubuntu 16.04.1
Dave, we just had a quick ad hoc webex.
Ed merged:
Update VPP CSIT verify jobs to 1604
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3444/
And we’re verifying vpp patch for migrating vpp-csit-verify-virl to
Dave, we just had a quick ad hoc webex.
Ed merged:
Update VPP CSIT verify jobs to 1604
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3444/
And we’re verifying vpp patch for migrating vpp-csit-verify-virl to
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkonstan@...>
·
#13
·
|
|
Re: Honeycomb integration job
Adding csit-dev.
By
Samuel Elias -X (samelias - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <samelias@...>
·
#14
·
|
|
Re: [FD.io Helpdesk #31559] Additional resources needed for rpm_dpdk project
CJ,
Yes, thanks and I have patches CI man ready to submit.
The question is about the order. Should the patch to CI man get submitted before or after the initial patch to rpm_dpdk.
CJ,
Yes, thanks and I have patches CI man ready to submit.
The question is about the order. Should the patch to CI man get submitted before or after the initial patch to rpm_dpdk.
|
By
Thomas F Herbert
·
#15
·
|
|
Patch to add rpm_dpdk jjb, 3452/3
Could someone please look at this patch. I am not sure why it is failing at this point and why the /etc/bootstrap.sha files are required. I inherited some of this boiler plat by copying yaml
Could someone please look at this patch. I am not sure why it is failing at this point and why the /etc/bootstrap.sha files are required. I inherited some of this boiler plat by copying yaml
|
By
Thomas F Herbert
·
#16
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] Patch to add rpm_dpdk jjb, 3452/3
I added a comment explaining why the verify job for ci-management is grumpy and how to fix it.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3452/
Ed
I added a comment explaining why the verify job for ci-management is grumpy and how to fix it.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3452/
Ed
|
By
Edward Warnicke
·
#17
·
|
|
Re: [csit-dev] Honeycomb integration job
Ed, CJ, could you pls help us move this one forward - as stuck in review few weeks now..
Change 3018 - Needs Non-Author-Code-Review Label
-Maciek
Ed, CJ, could you pls help us move this one forward - as stuck in review few weeks now..
Change 3018 - Needs Non-Author-Code-Review Label
-Maciek
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkonstan@...>
·
#18
·
|
|
Centos 7 support in Infra and CSIT
fd.io Folks,
I apologize in advance for "barking" on all the fd.io lists but this topic really is cross functional,
I want to formally propose that we add Centos 7 server to CSIT.
fd.io Folks,
I apologize in advance for "barking" on all the fd.io lists but this topic really is cross functional,
I want to formally propose that we add Centos 7 server to CSIT.
|
By
Thomas F Herbert
·
#19
·
|
|
Re: [Rpm_dpdk] Centos 7 support in Infra and CSIT
Tom,
There are already Jira tickets open for this:
Unfortunately there are currently no resources assigned to work on this issue. This topic was discussed in this
Tom,
There are already Jira tickets open for this:
Unfortunately there are currently no resources assigned to work on this issue. This topic was discussed in this
|
By
Dave Wallace <dwallacelf@...>
·
#20
·
|