|
CSIT E810 flow offload perf difference between Intel Lab 4 messages
HI all, I want get your attention CSIT lab E810 perf results are a bit off compare to the Intel Lab on ICX platform. 1. TG : Mellanox 100G NIC, DUT : 100G e810-cq. GTPU perf on ICX with e810-CQ: Test
HI all, I want get your attention CSIT lab E810 perf results are a bit off compare to the Intel Lab on ICX platform. 1. TG : Mellanox 100G NIC, DUT : 100G e810-cq. GTPU perf on ICX with e810-CQ: Test
|
By
Ji, Kai
·
|
|
how to convert job_specs to robot commands 2 messages
Hi, Starting a thread re question from Georgii, per my action from CSIT meeting 01-Feb, points 6y to 6ah in [1]: Question from Georgii: how to convert job_specs to robot commands, IOW running tests wi
Hi, Starting a thread re question from Georgii, per my action from CSIT meeting 01-Feb, points 6y to 6ah in [1]: Question from Georgii: how to convert job_specs to robot commands, IOW running tests wi
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
·
|
|
CSIT patch review 5 messages
Hi Maciek, Dave, Peter and Vratko, Please kind help to review below patches for CSIT 23.02, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/37942 Add tcp hoststack with DMA test suites https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+
Hi Maciek, Dave, Peter and Vratko, Please kind help to review below patches for CSIT 23.02, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/37942 Add tcp hoststack with DMA test suites https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+
|
By
Pei, Yulong
·
|
|
[tsc] Developer & Development Forum (Virtual) - February 13-16
Fyi Begin forwarded message: From: "Casey Cain" <ccain@...> Subject: [tsc] Developer & Development Forum (Virtual) - February 13-16 Date: 19 January 2023 at 16:36:55 GMT To: TAC <lfn-tac@...>, ODIM TS
Fyi Begin forwarded message: From: "Casey Cain" <ccain@...> Subject: [tsc] Developer & Development Forum (Virtual) - February 13-16 Date: 19 January 2023 at 16:36:55 GMT To: TAC <lfn-tac@...>, ODIM TS
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
·
|
|
CSIT rls2302 branch pulled out 2 messages
CSIT rls2302 branch [0] is created and fully functional. Corresponding operational branch (oper-rls2302-230223) has been created too. We are starting dry runs for performance ndrpdr iterative tests to
CSIT rls2302 branch [0] is created and fully functional. Corresponding operational branch (oper-rls2302-230223) has been created too. We are starting dry runs for performance ndrpdr iterative tests to
|
By
Tibor Frank
·
|
|
回复: [csit-dev] Questions about triggering performance tests in FD.io gerrit
Thanks, Vratko. I can see the recent build I tried is successful. Thanks for your quick fix! Cheers, Jieqiang Wang 发件人: csit-dev@... <csit-dev@...> 代表 Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
Thanks, Vratko. I can see the recent build I tried is successful. Thanks for your quick fix! Cheers, Jieqiang Wang 发件人: csit-dev@... <csit-dev@...> 代表 Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
|
By
Jieqiang Wang
·
|
|
MTU and reassembly tests
My optimistic plan for rls2302 was to merge reassembly performance tests. We are too close to release now, so tests will not be ready, but some of preparation work (involving MTU) will. Historically,
My optimistic plan for rls2302 was to merge reassembly performance tests. We are too close to release now, so tests will not be ready, but some of preparation work (involving MTU) will. Historically,
|
By
Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
·
|
|
Questions about triggering performance tests in FD.io gerrit 4 messages
Hi CSIT Maintainers, I’m writing to seek help on triggering performance testing in FD.io gerrit and see the performance differences with/without a particular patch. I have a patch[0] in FD.io gerrit a
Hi CSIT Maintainers, I’m writing to seek help on triggering performance testing in FD.io gerrit and see the performance differences with/without a particular patch. I have a patch[0] in FD.io gerrit a
|
By
Jieqiang Wang
·
|
|
VPP 23.02 RC1 milestone is complete!
Hi all, 23.02 RC1 is done, the master branch is open for all commits, the stable/2302 branch is created and is open for the cherry-picks of the bug fixes - which would need to first be merged into mas
Hi all, 23.02 RC1 is done, the master branch is open for all commits, the stable/2302 branch is created and is open for the cherry-picks of the bug fixes - which would need to first be merged into mas
|
By
Andrew Yourtchenko
·
|
|
[lfn-TAC] Call for Mentors - 2023 Mentorship Program is live
Folks, One of the 2023 goals for the FD.io community is to foster growth of open source software by mentoring those interested in learning how to contribute. Please consider submitting a mentorship pr
Folks, One of the 2023 goals for the FD.io community is to foster growth of open source software by mentoring those interested in learning how to contribute. Please consider submitting a mentorship pr
|
By
Dave Wallace
·
|
|
[vpp-dev] [csit-dev] Bumping dpdk to 22.11 in vpp 23.02 ? 2 messages
Hi Fan, There was a VPP Community meeting this Tuesday at the new time (5am PST) that was lightly attended. Thanks, -daw- On 1/12/2023 4:42 AM, Zhang, Fan wrote:
Hi Fan, There was a VPP Community meeting this Tuesday at the new time (5am PST) that was lightly attended. Thanks, -daw- On 1/12/2023 4:42 AM, Zhang, Fan wrote:
|
By
Dave Wallace
·
|
|
Bumping dpdk to 22.11 in vpp 23.02 ? 3 messages
Hi, On CSIT call just now Kai made us aware of issues with above (cryptodev, sat), as captured in this patch: 37840: dpdk: make impact to VPP for changes in API for DPDK 22.11 | https://gerrit.fd.io/r
Hi, On CSIT call just now Kai made us aware of issues with above (cryptodev, sat), as captured in this patch: 37840: dpdk: make impact to VPP for changes in API for DPDK 22.11 | https://gerrit.fd.io/r
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
·
|
|
af_xdp performance is wrong in CSIT report ? 9 messages
Hi Csit-dev, As subject and below link, af_xdp performance in CSIT report is too low, is it wrong ? https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/master/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-icx-x
Hi Csit-dev, As subject and below link, af_xdp performance in CSIT report is too low, is it wrong ? https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/master/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-icx-x
|
By
Pei, Yulong
·
|
|
Fast PAPI
Currently, CSIT uses VAT (Vpp Api Test) in multiple places, all of them related to some scale test. We do not want to keep using VAT, as it does not have stability guarantees on API messages. While al
Currently, CSIT uses VAT (Vpp Api Test) in multiple places, all of them related to some scale test. We do not want to keep using VAT, as it does not have stability guarantees on API messages. While al
|
By
Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
·
|
|
VPP CSIT meeting update 5 messages
FYI Forwarding as it looks the original email didn’t get through.
FYI Forwarding as it looks the original email didn’t get through.
|
By
Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
·
|
|
Core isolation on kernel command line deprecated 2 messages
Hello CSIT devs, While looking for possible causes for the 3n-tsh VM testcase timeouts, Tianyu from arm found out that the isolcpus kernel command line parameter has been deprecated. It seems that no
Hello CSIT devs, While looking for possible causes for the 3n-tsh VM testcase timeouts, Tianyu from arm found out that the isolcpus kernel command line parameter has been deprecated. It seems that no
|
By
Juraj Linkeš
·
|
|
FDIO Maintenance: 2022-12-07 18:00 UTC to 00:00 UTC 4 messages
What: Jenkins Jenkins sandbox and production OS and security updates Jenkins upgrade Plugin upgrades Gerrit OS and security updates JIRA OS and security updates JIRA upgrade JIRA migration Ingress OS
What: Jenkins Jenkins sandbox and production OS and security updates Jenkins upgrade Plugin upgrades Gerrit OS and security updates JIRA OS and security updates JIRA upgrade JIRA migration Ingress OS
|
By
Vanessa Valderrama
·
|
|
CANCELLED - FDIO Maintenance: 2022-11-30 16:00 UTC to 01:00 UTC
Cancelled due to scheduling conflicts. I will reschedule after the holiday. Thank you, Vanessa On 10/27/22 10:13 AM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: To avoid delaying CSIT reports, we are moving this mainte
Cancelled due to scheduling conflicts. I will reschedule after the holiday. Thank you, Vanessa On 10/27/22 10:13 AM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: To avoid delaying CSIT reports, we are moving this mainte
|
By
Vanessa Valderrama
·
|
|
VPP 2206 with CSIT 2210 2 messages
In previous CSIT releases the “Current vs Previous Release” tables had two “diff” columns (example: [0]), so performance effects due to VPP code changes were separated from all other effects (mostly C
In previous CSIT releases the “Current vs Previous Release” tables had two “diff” columns (example: [0]), so performance effects due to VPP code changes were separated from all other effects (mostly C
|
By
Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
·
|
|
FD.io CSIT-2210 Release Report has been published 3 messages
Hi All, FD.io CSIT-2210 report is now available on FD.io docs site: https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2210/report/ Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and VPP communities f
Hi All, FD.io CSIT-2210 report is now available on FD.io docs site: https://s3-docs.fd.io/csit/rls2210/report/ Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and VPP communities f
|
By
Tibor Frank
·
|