> On 6 Feb 2017, at 18:03, Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <
mgradzki@...> wrote:
>
> Hc2vpp also publishes RC debs and rpms. To build them reliably we need rc jars.
> We use maven for build, so most convenient for us would be to have jvpp jars in the fd.io.release repo.
>
> Marek
>
> From: Ed Warnicke (eaw)
> Sent: 6 lutego 2017 17:51
> To: Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <
mgradzki@...>
> Cc: Ole Troan (otroan) <
otroan@...>; Ni, Hongjun <
hongjun.ni@...>;
vpp-dev@...;
hc2vpp@...;
nsh_sfc-dev@...
> Subject: Re: Publising jvpp rc jars
>
> Question… why do we need RC jars and not just SNAPSHOTs?
>
> Ed
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <
mgradzki@...> wrote:
>
> The only impediment for 17.01 was that we forgot to mention it on time.
>
> We had a chat regarding the topic and,
> as far as I remember, you mentioned such change
> could affect all
fd.io projects (don’t remember details),
> so we should move it to next release.
>
> In case of 17.04, jvpp jars (at least currently) are part of vpp-api-java package,
> so perhaps it could be easier now…
>
> Regards,
> Marek
>
> From: Ed Warnicke (eaw)
> Sent: 6 lutego 2017 17:22
> To: Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <
mgradzki@...>
> Cc: Ole Troan (otroan) <
otroan@...>; Ni, Hongjun <
hongjun.ni@...>;
vpp-dev@...;
hc2vpp@...;
nsh_sfc-dev@...
> Subject: Re: Publising jvpp rc jars
>
> What was the impediment for 17.01?
>
> Ed
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <
mgradzki@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible to publish jvpp rc jars in nexus for 17.04?
>
>
https://nexus.fd.io/content/repositories/fd.io.release/io/fd/vpp/
>
> For 17.01 only rc debs and rpms were published.
>
> Publishing rc jars would allow publishing rc artifacts by hc2vpp project (and also nsh_sfc project we depend on).
> Currently hc2vpp rc artifacts have to depend on jvpp snapshots which is not very reliable.
>
> Thanks,
> Marek
>