Date
1 - 2 of 2
HC2VPP: Plugin Implementation question
|
Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) <mgradzki@...>
Hi,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I think v3po is currently better place for af_packet. We planned to move some of the functionalities out from v3po and then rename it to vpp-interfaces: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/5583/ But this is on hold currently. Regards, Marek -----Original Message-----
From: hc2vpp-bounces@... [mailto:hc2vpp-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Madhu Mohan Sent: 13 listopada 2017 15:03 To: hc2vpp@... Subject: [hc2vpp] HC2VPP: Plugin Implementation question Hi I am currently working on af_packet api for HC2VPP (https://jira.fd.io/browse/HC2VPP-88). The description mentions that the implementation should be in line with ietf-interfaces. Marek shared with me the guide (https://docs.fd.io/hc2vpp/1.17.04-SNAPSHOT/release-notes-aggregator/devel_plugin_vpp_tutorial.html) to help. This is quite useful. At first attempt, I attempted to implement AF_Packet as a separate plugin on the lines of "NAT", "NSH" or "ACL". However, I found that, AF_PACKET is more closer to implementation for "vhost-user" implementation which is part of the V3PO plugins. Can someone please suggest which approach is expected ? I currently have 2 versions of code. I can submit a patch for review based on the approach suggested. Thanks and Regards, Madhu Mohan _______________________________________________ hc2vpp mailing list hc2vpp@... https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/hc2vpp |
|
|
|
Madhu Mohan <mmnelemane@...>
Hi
I am currently working on af_packet api for HC2VPP (https://jira.fd.io/browse/HC2VPP-88). The description mentions that the implementation should be in line with ietf-interfaces. Marek shared with me the guide (https://docs.fd.io/hc2vpp/1.17.04-SNAPSHOT/release-notes-aggregator/devel_plugin_vpp_tutorial.html) to help. This is quite useful. At first attempt, I attempted to implement AF_Packet as a separate plugin on the lines of "NAT", "NSH" or "ACL". However, I found that, AF_PACKET is more closer to implementation for "vhost-user" implementation which is part of the V3PO plugins. Can someone please suggest which approach is expected ? I currently have 2 versions of code. I can submit a patch for review based on the approach suggested. Thanks and Regards, Madhu Mohan |
|
|