[Moving to nsh_sfc-dev alias …] Thanks John. Yes, the example in the document is correct. Jim From: "John Lo (loj)" <loj@...> Date: Friday, April 1, 2016 at 2:01 PM To: Suman Kpatra/KOL/TCS <suman.kpa

Dear Jim and Everyone, Thank you for your assistance on implementing basis service chaining using nsh. How do we send ICMP packets to test the same? Is there a major code change in sff_client.py ? Any

<< Looping again as i don't see this post in dev mail list>> Dear Jim and Everyone, Thank you for your assistance on implementing basis service chaining using nsh. How do we send ICMP packets to test

Dear all, Trying out service chaining with segment routing along with nsh vxlan tunnel for the following use case: Source---->VPP1--->Service1---->VPP1--->VPP2--->Service2--->VPP2--->VPP3--->Service3-

Dear Jim, I want to follow below RSP: gbpsfc1​(sff-source) -> 1,255 -> vpp​(sff) -> 1,255 -> gbpsfc2​(SF1) -> 1,254 -> vpp​ (sff)-> 1,254 -> gbpsfc3(SF2)-> 1,253 -> vpp​(sff) -> 1,253-> gbpsfc1(sff-de

Dear all, Trying out service chaining with segment routing along with nsh vxlan tunnel for the following use case: Source---->VPP1--->Service1---->VPP1--->VPP2--->Service2--->VPP2--->VPP3--->Service3-

Adding nsh_sfc-dev ... answers inline.. I don't think this will work. We are explicitly creating tunnels. If we are 10.1.1.1, we want to know who is trying to send us stuff, not just randomly accept a

Hi Team, Below is the packet information from ICMP: 192.168.1.2, which indicate that vpp is successfully processing packets. As per the Vpp concept "Rather than processing the first packet through the

OTOH, Per packet traceBuffer, timeStamping logic exists at every graph node From: <vpp-dev-bounces@...> on behalf of Deepak Jain4 <deepak.jain4@...> Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 4:53 AM To: "csit

Dear Jim, As provided in your document regarding service chaining with nsh vxlan gpe, we were using gbpsfc1 as SFF as well as source/destination of packets. We were generating packets in gbpsfc1 using

Sorry for the spray... but wanted to be sure I caught everyone since this applies to all projects, and not sure everyone is on discuss@ As per below, in the OpenDaylight project, when I put the follow

Here's an example of the format: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/498/ https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-2 The forward linking (ie, linking from Gerrit to Jira) is not working. I confirmed before abandoning the

We need a PTL for this project. This person must be a committer. And it must be by self-nomination. So please, if you are a committer interested in taking on this responsibility, please nominate yours

Folks, I was hoping we could either a) shorten meeting to 30min and keep actions / results on the wiki b) keep to an hour but meet once every two weeks. Way too many projects on the boil at the moment

Folks, we should probably get rolling on the whole PTL thing. Any committers up for it?

Folks, I have a design I would like to pursue to move the work I already did in VPP over to NSH_sfc and make that project a plugin. Note this doesn't have to be a "final" or absolute design for how th

I would like to see a tidy way to pull in these plugin projects into a VPP build with minimal fuss, including building against a dev tree of VPP without having to install it first – otherwise I can se

Hi Keith, The agenda is already posted and the main topic is to discuss the work you have been doing. Jim From: <vpp-dev-bounces@...> on behalf of Keith Burns <alagalah@...> Date: Sunday, April 24, 20

Folks, We've been discussing this since the project was formed, which is fine, but given this isn't "net new" information for anyone, as discussed on the call I'd like to propose a more aggressive tim

https://wiki.fd.io/view/NSH_SFC/Docs/Designs (note that the actual header isn't ToC'ing yet, so link is in the above)