The rpm_dpdk project meeting is canceled for today, March 21. --TFH -- Thomas F Herbert SDN Group Office of Technology Red Hat

It must be enabled in dpdk config and it is not enabled by default. WRT to RPM packaging. Which of these options is the best: Add -with-crypto option to RPM and build 2 binary RPMs with and with crypt

Folks, I just wanted to start a thread regarding DPDK Cryptodev packaging. Currently Crytpodev PMDs (expcept NULL crypto PMD) are not being built in default DPDK config and as far as I am aware, they

We haven't pushed tags yet. Now that versions through current are currently supported, I would like to propose a double tagging system 1. Tags consistent with vpp: v16.09, v17.01 etc. 2. Tags consiste

Thanks Ed. Adding my 2 cents inline below just to provide another POV ... Well, to Enable the config itself isn't bad until enable_unsafe_noiommu_modeis set (which is default off). See https://patchwo

Looping in the deb_dpdk and rpm_dpdk guys to see if they have thoughts on how these things play out in deployment. Ed

I would like to see some plustwos before merging. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4494/ -- Thomas F Herbert SDN Group Office of Technology Red Hat

Weekly rpm_dpdk project meeting cancelled today. Next meeting will be January 3rd. -- Thomas F Herbert SDN Group Office of Technology Red Hat

All - Given the holiday today, I’ll wax a bit on the accomplishments of fd.io over the last 12 months. February 11, 2016, fd.io launched. It's purpose was to build the software dataplane for the next

+1 for 7.3 Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited From: csit-dev-bounces@... [mailto:csit-dev-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Dave Wallace Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 5:56 PM To: Thoma

Forwarding to fdio dpdk packaging lists. -- Thomas F Herbert SDN Group Office of Technology Red Hat

fd.io Folks, I apologize in advance for "barking" on all the fd.io lists but this topic really is cross functional, I want to formally propose that we add Centos 7 server to CSIT. The purpose would be

Looping in the deb_dpdk and rpm_dpdk projects to see if we can work together on getting vpp out of the business of building DPDK (and DPDK packages) while still retaining the ability to quickly incorp

FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...> Date: Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:11 AM Subject: [tsc] EMERGENCY FD.io Nexus Maintenance: 2016-12-09 @ 1000- 11:00 PDT

Looping in deb_dpdk and rpm_dpdk who are packaging DPDK for downstream Linux distros, to make sure they are also aware of your interest in that driver. Ed

Hi, We can certainly give it a shot, if it builds without problems I don't see an issue to enable it in the deb packaging. Kind regards, Luca Boccassi

Weekly meeting canceled for today, 29-nov-16. -- Thomas F Herbert SDN Group Office of Technology Red Hat

The last merge-master build of rpm_dpdk failed because of a missing function in the yaml. A patch was pushed to ci-man to hopefully fix this but didn't require another patch to rpm_dpdk. Is there a wa

Tom, thanks for “barking” to the mailer :) Per Dave’s note, Centos is indeed on CSIT project to-do list for some time. Your proposal is also very timely as some consumers of Centos, namely OPNFV/FDS h

Patch submitted and build is passing. https://jenkins.fd.io/job/ci-management-merge-jjb/1157/ Thanks, Vanessa On Tue Oct 18 13:04:04 2016, cjcollier wrote: > This change has been merged, but the build