Hello Ed,

I'm happy with the document, and I have no preference for archival.

Thank you!

On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 19:42 -0600, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> Luca, Christian,
>
> I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at
> tomorrow's TSC meeting:
>
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk/Termination_Review
>
> If you could:
>
> a)  Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived
> b)  Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is
> presented in that document
>
> it would be most helpful to us :)
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <
> hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
> > We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done.  Thank you for
> > all you've done!
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Christian,
> > > > > Thank you for reaching out.  We’ve enjoyed having you as part
> > > of
> > > > > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > > > > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other
> > > resources we
> > > > > provide.  You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not
> > > use
> > > > > them if you so choose.
> > > > > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > > > > fd.io project.  Those decisions are entirely in the hands of
> > > your
> > > > > project committers :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you
> > > elect,
> > > > > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io
> > > project.
> > > > But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want
> > > to
> > > > remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> > > >
> > > > @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active,
> > > are
> > > > you of the same opinion?
> > > > If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for
> > > end
> > > users. Thanks for all the help!
> > >
> > > > > Ed
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > > > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi FD.io,
> > > > > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that
> > > we
> > > > > > got in our early years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We used to use the project:
> > > > > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And along that resources for
> > > > > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > > > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > > > > - CI
> > > > > >
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days
> > > we
> > > > > > are really at home at
> > > > > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > > > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
> > > the
> > > > > > resources.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me
> > > know
> > > > > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could
> > > also
> > > > > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new
> > > places.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
> > > history if
> > > > > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > > > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > > > > Canonical Ltd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi