Re: ENEA and HCL contributions to CSIT
Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
The tests are still being used (even part of voting VPP verify job):
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-csit-verify-device-master-1n-skx/9274/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1-s5-s3 https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-csit-verify-device-master-1n-skx/9274/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1-s7-s1 Including their to-be-GPLed traffic scripts: https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-csit-verify-device-master-1n-skx/9274/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1-s5-s3-s1-t1-k2-k10-k4 https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-csit-verify-device-master-1n-skx/9274/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-s1-s7-s1-s1-t1-k2-k11-k4 Vratko. -----Original Message-----
From: tsc@... <tsc@...> On Behalf Of Florin Coras (fcoras) via lists.fd.io Sent: Monday, 2020-October-05 21:47 To: Kinsella, Ray <mdr@...>; tsc@...; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkonstan@...> Subject: Re: [tsc] ENEA and HCL contributions to CSIT I'll let Maciek clarify that, but I think we're no longer running them. I'm okay with removing them, if they're disabled. Regards, Florin On 10/5/20, 12:36 PM, "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@...> wrote: So we aren't even running them at the moment then? I presume if we aren't running them, we can safely remove them to solve our GPL issue? Would you object? Ray K On 05/10/2020 20:34, Florin Coras (fcoras) wrote: > Hi Ray, > > Would love to try to restart running those test cases, if we have enough resources. > > Hard to say if they'll work out of the box. > > Regards, > Florin > > > On 10/5/20, 12:32 PM, "Kinsella, Ray" <mdr@...> wrote: > > Folks, > > I had a look at the ENEA and HCL contributions contributions to CSIT. > You can find them here: > > * Lucian Banu (ENEA): https://git.fd.io/csit/commit/?id=4bafd0aa54fa78c4c3a6a32281cfa551e61bcafc > > Lucian's contribution is about 10-20 LoC, probably about 1hr or 2hr to rework by a volunteer. > Any volunteers ... ? > > * Nidhy (HCL): https://git.fd.io/csit/commit/?id=aafa2efa63b891e85ff13255691aae4909bc503c > > Nidhy's contribution is substantial, adding the following test case. > > LISP_IP4o4 > LISPGPE_IP4o4 > LISPGPE_IP6o4 > LISPGPE_IP6o4. > LISPGEP_IP4o6 > LISPGPE_IP6o6 > > CC'ing Florin (LISP maintainer) to understand, what is the impact if we need to excise these Test Cases without rework. > > Thanks, > > Ray K > |
|