The migration went much quicker towards the end. Maintenance is complete. All systems are available. Please open a ticket at support.linuxfoundation.org if you experience any issues.

We need to extend the maintenance window until 2300 to allow the volume migration to complete.

Jenkins has been placed in shtudown mode in preparation for maintenance.

Maintenance reminder

LFN Community: For those not yet familiar, the OPNFV Verification Program (OVP) is an open source, community-led compliance and verification program to demonstrate the readiness and availability of

What: LF will be performing standard system maintenance and a Jenkins migration Jenkins Migrate to two new SSD volumes OS updates

>only discovering this now. Not sure if it is relevant, but scapy linking has been introduced to TRex [20], CSIT [21] and VPP [22] in 2016 (although for CSIT it was the first real commit in the

Correcting the email subject to make it clear it’s related to Scapy licensing agenda topic for today’s FD.io TSC meeting. Cheers, -Maciek

Hi, Here is the background to Scapy licensing agenda topic for today’s FD.io TSC meeting. Cheers, -Maciek Begin forwarded message: From: "Miroslav Los -X (mirlos - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"

I have a real problem with important parts of fd.io (and CSIT is an important part both for the project and for consumers of the project) being tied to GPL. I am really unhappy that we are only

>[rk] Ok my understand is that TRex had moved to github – that TRex repo is dead. >I am not 100% certain it is still a FD.io project? TRex is still FD.io project as far as I know. Git+Gerrit

>Why is TRex’s licensing being questioned? It just happened to be the first FD.io project examined (by Miroslav) for dependencies. VPP and CSIT were examined (by Vratko) few days later.

Ok … we need to contain the problem domain here, as it is way too complicated at the moment. Why is TRex’s licensing being questioned? Aren’t we just consumers or TRex, we don’t

>>I am not entirely sure how vpp "make test" sends packets to VPP. >[rk] I thought it was veth network interface or similar, can you check? It seems this document [11] still applies. The python

Hi Vratko, Inline.

>How is scapy invoked, is it a separate process or is it directly like with VPP/TRex? The setup details differ. The C projects (VPP and the main part of TRex server) are usually separate

Hi Vratko, So there is a lot of information thanks for putting this together. What is of primary importance to understand is how TRex & VPP “talk” to scapy. Scapy is GPL, any

Adding some technical details with quick links. Scapy license [0] is GLP, not LGPL. In python, using "import" statement amounts to linking, which creates [1] a combined program, instead of a

Resending from Cisco email account as it’s back and cleared for sending emails to tsc mailer. Adding Miroslav, Hanoh and Vratko who has been also involved here (Miroslav brought up the issue). Ed,