|
Re: Pls add 3x new vpp committer approvals to tomorrow's TSC meeting agenda
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Dave Barach (dbarach) <dbarach@...> wrote: Dear Ed, |
|
|
|
Pls add 3x new vpp committer approvals to tomorrow's TSC meeting agenda
Dave Barach
Dear Ed,
The vpp project has nominated and voted overwhelmingly (*) to accept three new committers: Chris Luke: https://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/2016-May/000882.html Florin Coras: https://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/2016-May/000885.html Keith Burns: https://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/2016-May/000888.html Please add an agenda item to tomorrow's TSC meeting to approve these appointments. Thanks... Dave (*) 100% +1's with 7 of 9 possible votes cast. I've reminded the two stragglers to vote. (;-). |
|
|
|
Infra Ticket Prioritization
As discussed in the TSC today, while we are waiting to get general community access to the infrastructure ticketing system, I have put together a wiki page to try to enumerate and prioritize the existing tickets: This is done in large part to garner community feedback on the heuristic and priorities, so *please* do comment, make suggestions, tell me I did it all wrong, etc ;) Ed |
|
|
|
Intel Rep for 5/5 TSC call
Venkatesan, Venky
Keith Wiles (cc’d) will be Intel’s representative on today’s (3/31) Technical Steering Committee call.
Regards, -Venky
|
|
|
|
VPP release packaging Jira "EPIC"
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-36 This has 3 tasks: - original vpp-4 for RPM for OPNFV - Ubuntu 14.04 and Ubuntu 16.04 tasks I know folks are working on this but wanted to ensure we were tracking it in one place. If you are working on any of the above, can you please grab the particular one you are working on ? |
|
|
|
Re: NSH_SFC Project Technical Lead
Link to the vote: On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
NSH_SFC Project Technical Lead
Joel Halpern
After announcing the need for a PTL, calling for volunteers, getting a self-nomination, and getting confirmation from the committers that the willing individual is acceptable (i.e. the team unanimously supported the guy whose arm got twisted into volunteering) The PTL for the NSH_SFC project is Keith Burns of Cisco.
Yours, Joel |
|
|
|
FDIO TWS reminder
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
9:15 Pacific
WebEx: Cisco.WebEx.com/meet/krb (for this week... Will work out regular secure link soon) Topic: fdio documentation. Bring ideas, willingness to help. This is an open discussion. |
|
|
|
Videos from April Training/Hackfest
The videos from the Apr Training/Hackfest are up: (the link above is to a playlist for all of the videos). Enjoy! Ed |
|
|
|
VPP Sandbox Project Approval to next TSC meeting
Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
Hello TSC,
Could you please add the VPP Sandbox project proposal (https://wiki.fd.io/view/Project_Proposals/VPPSandbox) to next week agenda ? Thanks, - Pierre |
|
|
|
Slides for FD.io event and agenda proposal
Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
Hello,
Here are the slides for today's proposal presentation. https://cisco.box.com/s/tehu2juukcdlyf069c9uqg89rporu82p Thank, - Pierre |
|
|
|
Re: Project Proposal for Transport Layer Development Kit (TLDK)
O'Driscoll, Tim
I forgot to add, can we schedule the creation review for this project for Thursday May 12th please?
Tim
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of O'Driscoll, Tim
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 11:29 AM To: tsc@... Subject: [tsc] Project Proposal for Transport Layer Development Kit (TLDK)
Please accept this project proposal for Transport Layer Development Kit (TLDK) for consideration. https://wiki.fd.io/view/Project_Proposals/TLDK
|
|
|
|
Intel representation for 4/28 TSC call
Venkatesan, Venky
Tim O’Driscoll (cc’d) will be Intel’s representative on today’s (4/28) Technical Steering Committee call.
Regards, -Venky
Venky Venkatesan Intel Corp. Hillsboro, OR
|
|
|
|
Project Proposal for Transport Layer Development Kit (TLDK)
O'Driscoll, Tim
Please accept this project proposal for Transport Layer Development Kit (TLDK) for consideration. https://wiki.fd.io/view/Project_Proposals/TLDK
|
|
|
|
TWS for May3
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
Folks, I proposed an agenda for the TWS next week about fd.io Documentation I will kick off a separate thread on this topic to track the discussion/thoughts but with VPP 16.06 coming (F0 Friday, RC0/1 on its heals), its a topic I'd like to get some visibility on within the community. |
|
|
|
Re: TWS meeting agenda tomorrow 09:15am PST
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
Hi folks, Since David Jorm (who pretty much wrote the initial version of the ODL Security policy) is presenting to the TSC this Thu, we are cancelling this TWS meeting. I'll make the agenda as CANCELLED for this week. Any thoughts on next week's topic? Anything folks would like to discuss, have a tutorial on? On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM Keith Burns <alagalah@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: "Tunnel" naming convention
+1
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Keith Burns
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 2:40 PM To: tsc@...; discuss@... Subject: [tsc] "Tunnel" naming convention
Hello,
TSC: can I get 5min on the agenda this week to either give a readout on the below or minimally raise awareness the topic exists.
I was meeting with John Lo last week about an overlay design issue which led to a discussion on configuration.
Currently we use fields like "src" and "dst" in the configuration of things like VXLAN and SR (segment routing).
Note this is NOTa discussion about keys. Semantically what makes something unique is an implementation detail that is use case dependent IMHO and best left to another thread.
What John suggested was renaming things as "local" and "remote". I think this has definite merit and the reason for the wide distro is it would be " nice" (but not mandatory) that fd.io wide we could agree on a convention.
I believe such a change has a limited enough blast radius to be OK post vpp F0 this Friday, but would be nice to have consistent documentation for the VPP 16.06 release.
Wanted to get some discussion going sooner rather than later.
And with that, my administrivia checklist for the day is done and I can in good conscience get back to coding :)
|
|
|
|
"Tunnel" naming convention
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
Hello,
TSC: can I get 5min on the agenda this week to either give a readout on the below or minimally raise awareness the topic exists. I was meeting with John Lo last week about an overlay design issue which led to a discussion on configuration. Currently we use fields like "src" and "dst" in the configuration of things like VXLAN and SR (segment routing). Note this is NOTa discussion about keys. Semantically what makes something unique is an implementation detail that is use case dependent IMHO and best left to another thread. What John suggested was renaming things as "local" and "remote". I think this has definite merit and the reason for the wide distro is it would be " nice" (but not mandatory) that fd.io wide we could agree on a convention. I believe such a change has a limited enough blast radius to be OK post vpp F0 this Friday, but would be nice to have consistent documentation for the VPP 16.06 release. Wanted to get some discussion going sooner rather than later. And with that, my administrivia checklist for the day is done and I can in good conscience get back to coding :) |
|
|
|
Re: TWS meeting agenda tomorrow 09:15am PST
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:01 AM Keith Burns <alagalah@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
TWS meeting agenda tomorrow 09:15am PST
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
Hi there, Please note that the TWS first meeting is tomorrow 15min after the VPP meeting. First topic: Ed Warnicke will be presenting the OpenDaylight Security policy (as discussed at last TSC). |
|
|