|
2016-04-07 fd.io TSC Meeting Cancelled
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Intel representation for TSC 3/31 call
Venkatesan, Venky
Tim O’Driscoll (cc’d) will be Intel’s representative on today’s (3/31) Technical Steering Committee call.
Regards, -Venky
Venky Venkatesan Intel Corp. Hillsboro, OR |
||||
|
|
||||
|
fd.io NSH_SFC project page
Joel Halpern
Has been created at https://wiki.fd.io/view/NSH_SFC . The email list has been created. We will be getting information out about weekly calls as soon as possible.
Thank you, Joel |
||||
|
|
||||
|
FD.io summary
C.J. Collier
Hey folks, I'm creating Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora and EL packages, and one of the questions I'm asked a lot is what is the summary of the umbrella project? I can get summaries of each individual project from the wiki and I consider those to be the canonical location for these strings. However, there is no summary on the main page. Ed, should I ask you to put a summary on this page? Who is the single source of truth here? Thanks much, C.J. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Creating a project?
C.J. Collier
Okay team, I've gone through the configuration checklist. Please kick
the tires and let me know if I've missed anything! Cheers, C.J. On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:01 PM, C.J. Collier <cjcollier@...> wrote: Hey there Joel, |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Creating a project?
C.J. Collier
Hey there Joel,
I'm on this now. I've stood up the LDAP groups and JIRA projects for NSH and ONE. I've got a long checklist to walk down, but will have it taken care of ASAP. Cheers, C.J. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Creating a project?
Joel Halpern
I was trying to follow the procedures laid out in the New_Project_Checklist. It starts with “make sure you have a git repository and make sure you have a jjb. NSH_SFC does not appear to have either one. Nor does it have a Jira Project or an email list.
It looks like I should have all those before I go make my project main page using the template.
But I cannot determine the magic incantation to make them appear.
Suggestions? Thanks, Joel |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: [vpp-dev] fd.io Training/Hackfest Apr 4-7: Registration Link
Martin, The plan is to record the sessions and post them, similar to: Ed On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Martin Ivanov <martin@...> wrote:
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: [vpp-dev] fd.io Training/Hackfest Apr 4-7: Registration Link
Martin Ivanov <martin@...>
Hi Ed, Do you plan to record and publish videos from the training/hackfest sessions ? (for the ones that are not able to participate..) Thanks. Martin
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Edward Warnicke <hagbard@...> wrote:
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: [discuss] Regular Technical Work Stream meeting
Florin Coras
+1
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Florin
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Regular Technical Work Stream meeting
Dave Barach
Seems like a fine idea to me.
Thanks… Dave
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Keith Burns (krb)
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:25 PM To: discuss@...; tsc@... Subject: [tsc] Regular Technical Work Stream meeting
How do folks feel about having a week/fortnightly TWS meeting at a scheduled time?
This has worked in ODL in the past, where topics of interest (interesting patches, use-cases, etc) can have a forum to be discussed.
Typically the agenda is held on a wiki page, where folks can self-nominate a topic, time needed etc and take the next available date, and if there is no agenda, there is no meeting.
Any thoughts, concerns?
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: fd.io Training/Hackfest Apr 4-7: Registration Link
The event has been updated with a tentative agenda: Please register soon, as seats are limited and we are filling up fast. Ed On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Edward Warnicke <hagbard@...> wrote:
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Regular Technical Work Stream meeting
Keith Burns (krb) <krb@...>
How do folks feel about having a week/fortnightly TWS meeting at a scheduled time? This has worked in ODL in the past, where topics of interest (interesting patches, use-cases, etc) can have a forum to be discussed. Typically the agenda is held on a wiki page, where folks can self-nominate a topic, time needed etc and take the next available date, and if there is no agenda, there is no meeting. Any thoughts, concerns? |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Bay Area fd.io meetup
Ashlee Young <ashlee@...>
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Bay Area fd.io meetup
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
Is there anyone interested in working with me on forming a regular fd.io Bay Area Meetup? |
||||
|
|
||||
|
NETLINK project proposal working doc
Keith Burns <alagalah@...>
Excuse the tardiness, but please find the link to the working doc for creating a NETLINK project proposal. Please note, in the past with these things I have found it effective to
Since I don’t know anyone’s preferred gdoc account, simply request edit access if you are interested in being an initial committer to the project. My thoughts on committers:
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Initial Security Process draft
Ashlee Young <ashlee@...>
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Initial Security Process draft
Joel Halpern
I did not realize there were any meaningful choices to be made in terms of protecting the project. Given that there are choices, we should consider the issue, rather than just letting it slide. I do consider it a separate issue from the security process for getting, processing, and resolving security issues in the code itself.
Yours, Joel
From: Ashlee [mailto:ashlee@...]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:58 PM To: Joel Halpern; tsc@... Subject: Re: Initial Security Process draft
Hi Joel,
If that’s the decision of the TSC, I can totally understand. In OPNFV, we were recently compromised when malware struck our Wiki. We lost several days of being able to post pertinent release updates or other information when that hit. My understanding is that while LF does provide hosting and other resources for us, we do have the ability to override certain default selections, for example the use of Media Wiki vs. the de facto wiki solution.
Not a biggie for me. Just thought we might want to have a policy that supports when we have an opinion. Also, I think the tools will also help determine how we can actually support the later part of the deck.
Hope this explanation helps.
Best,
Ash
From:
Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@...>
The later parts of this looked philosophically correct (we need a way to get reports and react to them, …) I am a little confused about the earlier part of the deck, as it seems to be about protecting the project resources themselves from attacks. While important, my understanding is that such was the LF responsibility. We can report problems, but it is not a TSC task.
Yours, Joel
From:
tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Ashlee
Hi Everyone,
This week is pretty crazy with the OPNFV Hackfest and with ONS. I’ve attached an initial draft of the security process. I still need to work out the flows, but since they’re kinda dependent on whether or not we agree to my initial assumptions, I thought this would be a good place for some initial feedback.
My wife and I found out a couple days ago that our daughter is getting an honor roll award at 8am this morning, so I will not be able to attend the TSC call. I do plan to be on the next one, on the 25th.
I’m happy to have a call with anyone interested in discussing the slides, or we can have a IRC or other type of chat. Email also works.
Best,
Ash
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Initial Security Process draft
Ashlee <ashlee@...>
Hi Joel, If that’s the decision of the TSC, I can totally understand. In OPNFV, we were recently compromised when malware struck our Wiki. We lost several days of being able to post pertinent release updates or other information when that hit. My understanding is that while LF does provide hosting and other resources for us, we do have the ability to override certain default selections, for example the use of Media Wiki vs. the de facto wiki solution. Not a biggie for me. Just thought we might want to have a policy that supports when we have an opinion. Also, I think the tools will also help determine how we can actually support the later part of the deck. Hope this explanation helps. Best, Ash From: Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@...> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2016 at 6:36 AM To: Ashlee <ashlee@...>, "tsc@..." <tsc@...> Subject: RE: Initial Security Process draft The later parts of this looked philosophically correct (we need a way to get reports and react to them, …) I am a little confused about the earlier part of the deck, as it seems to be about protecting the project resources themselves from attacks. While important, my understanding is that such was the LF responsibility. We can report problems, but it is not a TSC task.
Yours, Joel
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Ashlee
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:39 PM To: tsc@... Subject: [tsc] Initial Security Process draft
Hi Everyone,
This week is pretty crazy with the OPNFV Hackfest and with ONS. I’ve attached an initial draft of the security process. I still need to work out the flows, but since they’re kinda dependent on whether or not we agree to my initial assumptions, I thought this would be a good place for some initial feedback.
My wife and I found out a couple days ago that our daughter is getting an honor roll award at 8am this morning, so I will not be able to attend the TSC call. I do plan to be on the next one, on the 25th.
I’m happy to have a call with anyone interested in discussing the slides, or we can have a IRC or other type of chat. Email also works.
Best,
Ash
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Initial Security Process draft
Joel Halpern
The later parts of this looked philosophically correct (we need a way to get reports and react to them, …) I am a little confused about the earlier part of the deck, as it seems to be about protecting the project resources themselves from attacks. While important, my understanding is that such was the LF responsibility. We can report problems, but it is not a TSC task.
Yours, Joel
From: tsc-bounces@... [mailto:tsc-bounces@...]
On Behalf Of Ashlee
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:39 PM To: tsc@... Subject: [tsc] Initial Security Process draft
Hi Everyone,
This week is pretty crazy with the OPNFV Hackfest and with ONS. I’ve attached an initial draft of the security process. I still need to work out the flows, but since they’re kinda dependent on whether or not we agree to my initial assumptions, I thought this would be a good place for some initial feedback.
My wife and I found out a couple days ago that our daughter is getting an honor roll award at 8am this morning, so I will not be able to attend the TSC call. I do plan to be on the next one, on the 25th.
I’m happy to have a call with anyone interested in discussing the slides, or we can have a IRC or other type of chat. Email also works.
Best,
Ash
|
||||
|
|