I had hoped my current meeting would end in time, but no, I can not join the TSC acll today. Sorry, Joel

I will not be able to make the call October 1. No proxy, sorry. Joel

Fine with me. Joel

I have a conflicting call tomorrow that I can not reschedule. Sorry. Yours, Joel

I am co-chairing another meeting at the time of the fd.io TSC call this week. Yours, Joel

Which time zone is the TSC call anchored to? Based on last week, I think it is US. But my calendar thinks it is tied somewhere else. I presume my calendar is confused? Thanks, Joel

I will likely miss both of the next two meetings. I will try to make them, but time difference and conflicting meetings will make it problematic. Unfortunately, ther eis no Ericsson person to serve as

I have a real problem with important parts of fd.io (and CSIT is an important part both for the project and for consumers of the project) being tied to GPL. I am really unhappy that we are only discov

I will not be able to join the call today. And no proxy available. Joel

I will not be able to make the TSC call this week, and have not been able to find a suitable proxy. Apologies. Joel

Sorry, I will e on an airplane, and do not have a proxy available. Yours, Joel

I will be on the TSC call Thursday. I hope I will be on the IRC, but at the moment I cannot make that work. Yours, Joel

Prem Sankar (copied) has my proxy for the upcoming July 26th fd.io TSC call. Apologies, Joel

I am inclined to allow the rep to pick a proxy from the other TSC members. If the TSC observes a pattern it has a problem with, then we can change the rules (and we probably have a bigger problem.) Yo

I have got to get folks to stop scheduling critical internal meetings on top of the fd.io TSC. Prem has my proxy again this week. Sorry, Joel

For the next two calls (25January 2018 and 1 February 2018), Prem Sankar has my proxy. Thank you, Joel

Can that be made to work with existing (e.g. socket) interfaces from the applications? So that an application that is written to use the Linux kernel stack could by configuration, maybe with some smal

Two related sets of questions: I am having trouble understanding from the proposal page what this will really do? What problem is it trying to solve? And I am unclear as to the relationship with vpp o

Deferring final resolution on the size makes good sense to me. We should decide for the phase 2 transition how many at large members we want to add, 1, 2, or 3. Yours, Joel

I guess I am more worried about the balance between Core and at-large than I am about the TSC size. Part of our disagreement is that given the limited role of the TSC, I do not see making it larger a