Topics

Removal of FD.io deb_dpdk resources


Vanessa Valderrama
 




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Removal of FD.io deb_dpdk resources
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:52:40 +0100
From: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@...>
To: Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...>
CC: Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>, cjcollier@... <cjcollier@...>, Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>, Josh Powers <josh.powers@...>


Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we got in our early years.

We used to use the project:

And along that resources for
- I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk

But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we are really at home at 

Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the resources.

We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.

Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if you like, but that is entirely up to you.

--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd


Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
 

Christian,
Thank you for reaching out.  We’ve enjoyed having you as part of our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we provide.  You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use them if you so choose.
You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a fd.io project.  Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your project committers :)

It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect, so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)

Ed

On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:

Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we got in our early years.

We used to use the project:

And along that resources for
- I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk

But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we are really at home at 

Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the resources.

We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.

Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if you like, but that is entirely up to you.

--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd


Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@...>
 



On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> wrote:
Christian,
Thank you for reaching out.  We’ve enjoyed having you as part of our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we provide.  You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use them if you so choose.
You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a fd.io project.  Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your project committers :)

It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect, so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
 
While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.

@Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are you of the same opinion?
If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.

Ed

On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:

Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we got in our early years.

We used to use the project:

And along that resources for
- I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk

But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we are really at home at 

Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the resources.

We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.

Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if you like, but that is entirely up to you.

--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd



--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd


Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
 

On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:


On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
wrote:
Christian,
Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part of
our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we
provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use
them if you so choose.
You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your
project committers :)


It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect,
so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)

While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to
remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.

@Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are
you of the same opinion?
If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
Hi,

Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for end
users. Thanks for all the help!

Ed

On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:

Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we
got in our early years.

We used to use the project:
- https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk

And along that resources for
- Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
- I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
- CI
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD

But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we
are really at home at
- https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk

Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the
resources.

We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know
which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also
just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.

Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if
you like, but that is entirely up to you.

--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi


Edward Warnicke
 

We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done.  Thank you for all you've done!

Ed

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...> wrote:
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
> wrote:
> > Christian,
> > Thank you for reaching out.  We’ve enjoyed having you as part of
> > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we
> > provide.  You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use
> > them if you so choose.
> > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > fd.io project.  Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your
> > project committers :)
> >
> >
> > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect,
> > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> >
>

> While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to
> remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
>
> @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are
> you of the same opinion?
> If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.

Hi,

Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for end
users. Thanks for all the help!

> > Ed
> >
> > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi FD.io,
> > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we
> > > got in our early years.
> > >
> > > We used to use the project:
> > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > >
> > > And along that resources for
> > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > - CI
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > >
> > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we
> > > are really at home at
> > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > >
> > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the
> > > resources.
> > >
> > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know
> > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also
> > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.
> > >
> > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if
> > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > Canonical Ltd
>
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi


Edward Warnicke
 

Luca, Christian,

I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at tomorrow's TSC meeting: 


If you could:

a)  Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived
b)  Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is presented in that document

it would be most helpful to us :)

Ed

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done.  Thank you for all you've done!

Ed

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...> wrote:
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
> wrote:
> > Christian,
> > Thank you for reaching out.  We’ve enjoyed having you as part of
> > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we
> > provide.  You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use
> > them if you so choose.
> > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > fd.io project.  Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your
> > project committers :)
> >
> >
> > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect,
> > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> >
>

> While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to
> remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
>
> @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are
> you of the same opinion?
> If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.

Hi,

Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for end
users. Thanks for all the help!

> > Ed
> >
> > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi FD.io,
> > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we
> > > got in our early years.
> > >
> > > We used to use the project:
> > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > >
> > > And along that resources for
> > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > - CI
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > >
> > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we
> > > are really at home at
> > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > >
> > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the
> > > resources.
> > >
> > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know
> > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also
> > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.
> > >
> > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if
> > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > Canonical Ltd
>
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi



Edward Warnicke
 

Luca, Christian,

Just as an update.  We discovered looking at the governance docs that the termination review doc needs to be out for two weeks for community review before we can vote on it.
I anticipate we will on Feb 6.  Thank you for all of your collaboration on this :)

Ed

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:34 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...> wrote:
Hello Ed,

I'm happy with the document, and I have no preference for archival.

Thank you!

On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 19:42 -0600, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> Luca, Christian,
>
> I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at
> tomorrow's TSC meeting:
>
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk/Termination_Review
>
> If you could:
>
> a)  Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived
> b)  Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is
> presented in that document
>
> it would be most helpful to us :)
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <
> hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
> > We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done.  Thank you for
> > all you've done!
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Christian,
> > > > > Thank you for reaching out.  We’ve enjoyed having you as part
> > > of
> > > > > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > > > > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other
> > > resources we
> > > > > provide.  You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not
> > > use
> > > > > them if you so choose.
> > > > > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > > > > fd.io project.  Those decisions are entirely in the hands of
> > > your
> > > > > project committers :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you
> > > elect,
> > > > > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io
> > > project.
> > > > But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want
> > > to
> > > > remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> > > >
> > > > @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active,
> > > are
> > > > you of the same opinion?
> > > > If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for
> > > end
> > > users. Thanks for all the help!
> > >
> > > > > Ed
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > > > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi FD.io,
> > > > > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that
> > > we
> > > > > > got in our early years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We used to use the project:
> > > > > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And along that resources for
> > > > > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > > > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > > > > - CI
> > > > > >
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days
> > > we
> > > > > > are really at home at
> > > > > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > > > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
> > > the
> > > > > > resources.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me
> > > know
> > > > > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could
> > > also
> > > > > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new
> > > places.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
> > > history if
> > > > > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > > > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > > > > Canonical Ltd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi


Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
 

Hello Ed,

I'm happy with the document, and I have no preference for archival.

Thank you!

On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 19:42 -0600, Ed Warnicke wrote:
Luca, Christian,

I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at
tomorrow's TSC meeting:

https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk/Termination_Review

If you could:

a) Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived
b) Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is
presented in that document

it would be most helpful to us :)

Ed


On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <
hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done. Thank you for
all you've done!

Ed


On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
wrote:
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:


On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...

wrote:
Christian,
Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part
of
our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other
resources we
provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not
use
them if you so choose.
You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of
your
project committers :)


It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you
elect,
so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)

While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io
project.
But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want
to
remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.

@Luca - you are the only other project committers still active,
are
you of the same opinion?
If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
Hi,

Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for
end
users. Thanks for all the help!

Ed

On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:

Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that
we
got in our early years.

We used to use the project:
- https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk

And along that resources for
- Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
- I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
- CI
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD

But we have to admit that times have changed and these days
we
are really at home at
- https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
- https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk

Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
the
resources.

We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me
know
which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could
also
just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new
places.

Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
history if
you like, but that is entirely up to you.

--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd

--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi


Edward Warnicke
 

Thank you both for your patience :)

The TSC voted today to archive the deb_dpdk project at FD.io:


Ed

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:08 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
Luca, Christian,

Just as an update.  We discovered looking at the governance docs that the termination review doc needs to be out for two weeks for community review before we can vote on it.
I anticipate we will on Feb 6.  Thank you for all of your collaboration on this :)

Ed

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:34 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...> wrote:
Hello Ed,

I'm happy with the document, and I have no preference for archival.

Thank you!

On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 19:42 -0600, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> Luca, Christian,
>
> I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at
> tomorrow's TSC meeting:
>
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk/Termination_Review
>
> If you could:
>
> a)  Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived
> b)  Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is
> presented in that document
>
> it would be most helpful to us :)
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <
> hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
> > We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done.  Thank you for
> > all you've done!
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Christian,
> > > > > Thank you for reaching out.  We’ve enjoyed having you as part
> > > of
> > > > > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > > > > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other
> > > resources we
> > > > > provide.  You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not
> > > use
> > > > > them if you so choose.
> > > > > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > > > > fd.io project.  Those decisions are entirely in the hands of
> > > your
> > > > > project committers :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you
> > > elect,
> > > > > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io
> > > project.
> > > > But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want
> > > to
> > > > remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> > > >
> > > > @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active,
> > > are
> > > > you of the same opinion?
> > > > If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for
> > > end
> > > users. Thanks for all the help!
> > >
> > > > > Ed
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > > > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi FD.io,
> > > > > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that
> > > we
> > > > > > got in our early years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We used to use the project:
> > > > > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And along that resources for
> > > > > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > > > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > > > > - CI
> > > > > >
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days
> > > we
> > > > > > are really at home at
> > > > > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > > > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
> > > the
> > > > > > resources.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me
> > > know
> > > > > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could
> > > also
> > > > > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new
> > > places.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
> > > history if
> > > > > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > > > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > > > > Canonical Ltd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi