FW: [Terminology] Guidance for NIST Staff on Using Inclusive Language in Documentary Standards (NISTIR 8366)
In the inclusive language discussion, folks had asked what other bodies are doing. The IETF is still spinning.
It struck me that the below note from NIST provides pointers to a number of good starting points if we need to get more careful.
From: Terminology <terminology-bounces@...> On Behalf Of
Today, NIST has published this Internal Report on "using inclusive language" publicly, in part because it may be useful to other standards groups interested in clarity and inclusiveness of terminology.
I think both the blog post and the report itself do a good job of describing the particular goals, including some examples (but not especially long lists), and pointing to other resources that might be useful for writing standards that are clear and respectful to a wide range of readers.
Hope this helps,