Topics

nomination committer ci-management


Luca Muscariello
 

Hi 

Mauro Sardara is a committer in cicn and hicn projects
and has contributed quite a bit in ci-management.

Below his contribution to ci-management,


In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer
to take care of our release management.

Thanks
Best
Luca


Vanessa Valderrama
 

Luca,

Have you discussed this Mauro and verified he is interested in becoming a committer?

Thank you,
Vanessa


On 1/30/20 1:25 PM, Luca Muscariello wrote:
Hi 

Mauro Sardara is a committer in cicn and hicn projects
and has contributed quite a bit in ci-management.

Below his contribution to ci-management,


In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer
to take care of our release management.

Thanks
Best
Luca


Luca Muscariello
 

+ Mauro

yes of course, Mauro would be happy to become a committer in ci-management.

Thanks
Luca

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:37 PM Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...> wrote:

Luca,

Have you discussed this Mauro and verified he is interested in becoming a committer?

Thank you,
Vanessa


On 1/30/20 1:25 PM, Luca Muscariello wrote:
Hi 

Mauro Sardara is a committer in cicn and hicn projects
and has contributed quite a bit in ci-management.

Below his contribution to ci-management,


In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer
to take care of our release management.

Thanks
Best
Luca


Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
 

> In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer

> to take care of our release management.

 

In ci-management, Gerrit does not allow an owner of a contribution

to vote +2 on it, even if the owner is a committer.

That means making Mauro a committer will not help Cicn nor Hicn directly,

unless somebody else starts contributing the needed changes.

 

Overall, ci-management could use more active committers,

I am just making sure the limits of their power are understood.

 

> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/q/project:ci-management+owner:msardara%2540cisco.com

 

In other words, that link does not give you

the list of changes that could have gotten merged sooner

if Mauro were a committer.

This [1] link does.

 

Vratko.

 

[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/q/project:ci-management+(reviewedby:msardara%2540cisco.com+OR+reviewer:msardara%2540cisco.com)+-owner:msardara%2540cisco.com

 

 

From: tsc@... <tsc@...> On Behalf Of Luca Muscariello
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 8:41 PM
To: Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...>; Mauro Sardara (msardara) <msardara@...>
Cc: ci-management-dev@...; hicn-dev@...; cicn-dev@...; tsc@...
Subject: Re: [tsc] nomination committer ci-management

 

+ Mauro

 

yes of course, Mauro would be happy to become a committer in ci-management.

 

Thanks

Luca

 

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:37 PM Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...> wrote:

Luca,

Have you discussed this Mauro and verified he is interested in becoming a committer?

Thank you,
Vanessa

 

On 1/30/20 1:25 PM, Luca Muscariello wrote:

Hi 

 

Mauro Sardara is a committer in cicn and hicn projects

and has contributed quite a bit in ci-management.

 

Below his contribution to ci-management,

 

 

In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer

to take care of our release management.

 

Thanks

Best

Luca

 


Luca Muscariello
 



On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:46 PM Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) <vrpolak@...> wrote:

> In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer

> to take care of our release management.

 

In ci-management, Gerrit does not allow an owner of a contribution

to vote +2 on it, even if the owner is a committer.

That means making Mauro a committer will not help Cicn nor Hicn directly,

unless somebody else starts contributing the needed changes.


Alberto takes care of the release update, so in that case it would be
his responsibility to take care of ci-management as well.

Mauro would take care of reviewing ci-management for what concerns these release
phases jointly with Alberto and myself.
In any case Mauro would continue to contribute to ci-management as usual.

In the past we have had problems for patches on ci-management pending for too long.
We are a small team and most of the time others do not pay attention to our own
patches. Any dependency with people that are not directly committed to our projects
means disruption and broken distributions to our user-base. It happened more than once.

This is why we'd need one team member to pay attention to our own patches in 
ci-management too, in due time, especially during new release phases.

 

 

Overall, ci-management could use more active committers,

I am just making sure the limits of their power are understood.

 

> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/q/project:ci-management+owner:msardara%2540cisco.com


The above link is something Vanessa has asked me to send because TSC requires 
to see measurable contributions for a committer to be nominated candidate
in a given project.
But the link you've shared gives additional arguments, thanks.

 

 

In other words, that link does not give you

the list of changes that could have gotten merged sooner

if Mauro were a committer.

This [1] link does.

 

Vratko.

 

[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/q/project:ci-management+(reviewedby:msardara%2540cisco.com+OR+reviewer:msardara%2540cisco.com)+-owner:msardara%2540cisco.com

 

 

From: tsc@... <tsc@...> On Behalf Of Luca Muscariello
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 8:41 PM
To: Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...>; Mauro Sardara (msardara) <msardara@...>
Cc: ci-management-dev@...; hicn-dev@...; cicn-dev@...; tsc@...
Subject: Re: [tsc] nomination committer ci-management

 

+ Mauro

 

yes of course, Mauro would be happy to become a committer in ci-management.

 

Thanks

Luca

 

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:37 PM Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...> wrote:

Luca,

Have you discussed this Mauro and verified he is interested in becoming a committer?

Thank you,
Vanessa

 

On 1/30/20 1:25 PM, Luca Muscariello wrote:

Hi 

 

Mauro Sardara is a committer in cicn and hicn projects

and has contributed quite a bit in ci-management.

 

Below his contribution to ci-management,

 

 

In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer

to take care of our release management.

 

Thanks

Best

Luca

 


Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
 

> Alberto takes care of the release update, so in that case it would be

> his responsibility to take care of ci-management as well.

> Mauro would take care of reviewing

 

Alright then.

 

@Vanessa Valderrama Is this thread also for committer votes?

If yes: +1.

 

Vratko.

 

From: Luca Muscariello <muscariello@...>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2020 1:37 PM
To: Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) <vrpolak@...>
Cc: Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...>; Mauro Sardara (msardara) <msardara@...>; ci-management-dev@...; hicn-dev@...; cicn-dev@...; tsc@...
Subject: Re: [tsc] nomination committer ci-management

 

 

 

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:46 PM Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) <vrpolak@...> wrote:

> In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer

> to take care of our release management.

 

In ci-management, Gerrit does not allow an owner of a contribution

to vote +2 on it, even if the owner is a committer.

That means making Mauro a committer will not help Cicn nor Hicn directly,

unless somebody else starts contributing the needed changes.

 

Alberto takes care of the release update, so in that case it would be

his responsibility to take care of ci-management as well.

 

Mauro would take care of reviewing ci-management for what concerns these release

phases jointly with Alberto and myself.

In any case Mauro would continue to contribute to ci-management as usual.

 

In the past we have had problems for patches on ci-management pending for too long.

We are a small team and most of the time others do not pay attention to our own

patches. Any dependency with people that are not directly committed to our projects

means disruption and broken distributions to our user-base. It happened more than once.

 

This is why we'd need one team member to pay attention to our own patches in 

ci-management too, in due time, especially during new release phases.

 

 

 

Overall, ci-management could use more active committers,

I am just making sure the limits of their power are understood.

 

> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/q/project:ci-management+owner:msardara%2540cisco.com

 

The above link is something Vanessa has asked me to send because TSC requires 

to see measurable contributions for a committer to be nominated candidate

in a given project.

But the link you've shared gives additional arguments, thanks.

 

 

 

In other words, that link does not give you

the list of changes that could have gotten merged sooner

if Mauro were a committer.

This [1] link does.

 

Vratko.

 

[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/q/project:ci-management+(reviewedby:msardara%2540cisco.com+OR+reviewer:msardara%2540cisco.com)+-owner:msardara%2540cisco.com

 

 

From: tsc@... <tsc@...> On Behalf Of Luca Muscariello
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2020 8:41 PM
To: Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...>; Mauro Sardara (msardara) <msardara@...>
Cc: ci-management-dev@...; hicn-dev@...; cicn-dev@...; tsc@...
Subject: Re: [tsc] nomination committer ci-management

 

+ Mauro

 

yes of course, Mauro would be happy to become a committer in ci-management.

 

Thanks

Luca

 

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 8:37 PM Vanessa Valderrama <vvalderrama@...> wrote:

Luca,

Have you discussed this Mauro and verified he is interested in becoming a committer?

Thank you,
Vanessa

 

On 1/30/20 1:25 PM, Luca Muscariello wrote:

Hi 

 

Mauro Sardara is a committer in cicn and hicn projects

and has contributed quite a bit in ci-management.

 

Below his contribution to ci-management,

 

 

In hicn it would be helpful to have a ci-management committer

to take care of our release management.

 

Thanks

Best

Luca