-------- Forwarded Message --------
Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that
we got in our early years.
We used to use the project:
And along that resources for
But we have to admit that times have changed and these
days we are really at home at
Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
the resources.
We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let
me know which process I need to trigger - as an alternative
I could also just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to
the new places.
Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
history if you like, but that is entirely up to you.
--
Christian
Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
|
|
Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
Christian,
Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part of our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we provide. You are welcome to remain a
fd.io project and not use them if you so choose.
You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your project committers :)
It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect, so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
Ed
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we got in our early years.
We used to use the project:
And along that resources for
But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we are really at home at
Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the resources.
We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.
Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if you like, but that is entirely up to you.
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
|
|
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@...>
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) < eaw@...> wrote:
Christian,
Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part of our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we provide. You are welcome to remain a
fd.io project and not use them if you so choose.
You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your project committers :)
It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect, so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :) While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project. But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
@Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are you of the same opinion?
If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
Ed
Hi FD.io,
The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we got in our early years.
We used to use the project:
And along that resources for
But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we are really at home at
Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the resources.
We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.
Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if you like, but that is entirely up to you.
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
-- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd
|
|
Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> wrote:
Christian, Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part of our community, and appreciate the work you all do. Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use them if you so choose. You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your project committers :)
It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect, so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project. But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
@Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are you of the same opinion? If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
Hi, Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for end users. Thanks for all the help! Ed
On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
Hi FD.io, The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we got in our early years.
We used to use the project: - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
And along that resources for - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk - CI https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we are really at home at - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the resources.
We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.
Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if you like, but that is entirely up to you.
-- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd
-- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
|
|

Edward Warnicke
We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done. Thank you for all you've done!
Ed
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi < bluca@...> wrote: On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
> wrote:
> > Christian,
> > Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part of
> > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we
> > provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use
> > them if you so choose.
> > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your
> > project committers :)
> >
> >
> > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect,
> > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> >
>
>
> While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to
> remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
>
> @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are
> you of the same opinion?
> If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
Hi,
Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for end
users. Thanks for all the help!
> > Ed
> >
> > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi FD.io,
> > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we
> > > got in our early years.
> > >
> > > We used to use the project:
> > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > >
> > > And along that resources for
> > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > - CI
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > >
> > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we
> > > are really at home at
> > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > >
> > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the
> > > resources.
> > >
> > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know
> > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also
> > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.
> > >
> > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if
> > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > Canonical Ltd
>
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
|
|

Edward Warnicke
Luca, Christian,
I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at tomorrow's TSC meeting:
If you could:
a) Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived b) Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is presented in that document
it would be most helpful to us :)
Ed
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done. Thank you for all you've done!
Ed
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi < bluca@...> wrote: On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
> wrote:
> > Christian,
> > Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part of
> > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we
> > provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use
> > them if you so choose.
> > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your
> > project committers :)
> >
> >
> > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect,
> > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> >
>
>
> While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to
> remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
>
> @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are
> you of the same opinion?
> If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
Hi,
Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for end
users. Thanks for all the help!
> > Ed
> >
> > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi FD.io,
> > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we
> > > got in our early years.
> > >
> > > We used to use the project:
> > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > >
> > > And along that resources for
> > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > - CI
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > >
> > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days we
> > > are really at home at
> > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > >
> > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up the
> > > resources.
> > >
> > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me know
> > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could also
> > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new places.
> > >
> > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for history if
> > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > Canonical Ltd
>
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
|
|

Edward Warnicke
Luca, Christian,
Just as an update. We discovered looking at the governance docs that the termination review doc needs to be out for two weeks for community review before we can vote on it. I anticipate we will on Feb 6. Thank you for all of your collaboration on this :)
Ed
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:34 AM Luca Boccassi < bluca@...> wrote: Hello Ed,
I'm happy with the document, and I have no preference for archival.
Thank you!
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 19:42 -0600, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> Luca, Christian,
>
> I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at
> tomorrow's TSC meeting:
>
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk/Termination_Review
>
> If you could:
>
> a) Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived
> b) Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is
> presented in that document
>
> it would be most helpful to us :)
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <
> hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
> > We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done. Thank you for
> > all you've done!
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Christian,
> > > > > Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part
> > > of
> > > > > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > > > > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other
> > > resources we
> > > > > provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not
> > > use
> > > > > them if you so choose.
> > > > > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > > > > fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of
> > > your
> > > > > project committers :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you
> > > elect,
> > > > > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io
> > > project.
> > > > But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want
> > > to
> > > > remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> > > >
> > > > @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active,
> > > are
> > > > you of the same opinion?
> > > > If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for
> > > end
> > > users. Thanks for all the help!
> > >
> > > > > Ed
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > > > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi FD.io,
> > > > > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that
> > > we
> > > > > > got in our early years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We used to use the project:
> > > > > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And along that resources for
> > > > > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > > > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > > > > - CI
> > > > > >
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days
> > > we
> > > > > > are really at home at
> > > > > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > > > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
> > > the
> > > > > > resources.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me
> > > know
> > > > > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could
> > > also
> > > > > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new
> > > places.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
> > > history if
> > > > > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > > > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > > > > Canonical Ltd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
|
|
Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
Hello Ed,
I'm happy with the document, and I have no preference for archival.
Thank you!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 19:42 -0600, Ed Warnicke wrote: Luca, Christian,
I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at tomorrow's TSC meeting:
https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk/Termination_Review
If you could:
a) Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived b) Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is presented in that document
it would be most helpful to us :)
Ed
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io < hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done. Thank you for all you've done!
Ed
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...> wrote:
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...
wrote:
Christian, Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part of
our community, and appreciate the work you all do. Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other resources we
provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not use
them if you so choose. You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of your
project committers :)
It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you elect,
so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want to
remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
@Luca - you are the only other project committers still active, are
you of the same opinion? If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal. Hi,
Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for end users. Thanks for all the help!
Ed
On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
Hi FD.io, The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that we
got in our early years.
We used to use the project: - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
And along that resources for - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk - CI
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
But we have to admit that times have changed and these days
we
are really at home at - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
the
resources.
We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me
know
which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could
also
just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new
places.
Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
history if
you like, but that is entirely up to you.
-- Christian Ehrhardt Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd
-- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
|
|

Edward Warnicke
Thank you both for your patience :)
The TSC voted today to archive the deb_dpdk project at FD.io:
Ed
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Luca, Christian,
Just as an update. We discovered looking at the governance docs that the termination review doc needs to be out for two weeks for community review before we can vote on it. I anticipate we will on Feb 6. Thank you for all of your collaboration on this :)
Ed
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:34 AM Luca Boccassi < bluca@...> wrote: Hello Ed,
I'm happy with the document, and I have no preference for archival.
Thank you!
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 19:42 -0600, Ed Warnicke wrote:
> Luca, Christian,
>
> I have prepared the Termination Review document for consideration at
> tomorrow's TSC meeting:
>
> https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk/Termination_Review
>
> If you could:
>
> a) Indicate any preference you may have for where it is archived
> b) Review and indicate here that you are cool with how it is
> presented in that document
>
> it would be most helpful to us :)
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:15 AM Edward Warnicke via Lists.Fd.Io <
> hagbard=gmail.com@...> wrote:
> > We'll take it up at the TSC on Thu and get it done. Thank you for
> > all you've done!
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:04 AM Luca Boccassi <bluca@...>
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 09:18 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 6:20 PM Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Christian,
> > > > > Thank you for reaching out. We’ve enjoyed having you as part
> > > of
> > > > > our community, and appreciate the work you all do.
> > > > > Fd.io does not require you to use the Gerri and other
> > > resources we
> > > > > provide. You are welcome to remain a fd.io project and not
> > > use
> > > > > them if you so choose.
> > > > > You are also welcome to elect to move on from being a
> > > > > fd.io project. Those decisions are entirely in the hands of
> > > your
> > > > > project committers :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be helpful to us to know which of those choices you
> > > elect,
> > > > > so that we may proceed in a clear and orderly way :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > While there is no bad history at all with the deb_dpdk FD.io
> > > project.
> > > > But I'd think that for clarity's sake and cleaning up I'd want
> > > to
> > > > remove the deb_dpdk FD.io project.
> > > >
> > > > @Luca - you are the only other project committers still active,
> > > are
> > > > you of the same opinion?
> > > > If yes, I think Ed can go on and trigger the full removal.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes it's fine for me, having multiple "sources" is confusing for
> > > end
> > > users. Thanks for all the help!
> > >
> > > > > Ed
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 9, 2020, at 9:52 AM, Christian Ehrhardt <
> > > > > > christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi FD.io,
> > > > > > The deb_dpdk project is thankful for the home and help that
> > > we
> > > > > > got in our early years.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We used to use the project:
> > > > > > - https://wiki.fd.io/view/Deb_dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And along that resources for
> > > > > > - Gerrit https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=deb_dpdk.git
> > > > > > - I also saw a mirror on https://github.com/FDio/deb_dpdk
> > > > > > - CI
> > > > > >
> > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=ci-management.git;a=tree;f=jjb/deb_dpdk;h=efcd3beab9f199566ddd1c6e460600fc1f230d64;hb=HEAD
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But we have to admit that times have changed and these days
> > > we
> > > > > > are really at home at
> > > > > > - https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dpdk
> > > > > > - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpdk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Therefore I wanted to let you know that you could free up
> > > the
> > > > > > resources.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We can even discontinue the subproject itself if you let me
> > > know
> > > > > > which process I need to trigger - as an alternative I could
> > > also
> > > > > > just update the deb_dpdk wiki page to point to the new
> > > places.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Keeping the git/gerrit is probably cheap and worth for
> > > history if
> > > > > > you like, but that is entirely up to you.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Christian Ehrhardt
> > > > > > Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
> > > > > > Canonical Ltd
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
|
|